Electroreception
Olfaction
Hydrodynamics
Evolution
Cephalofoil dimorphism
Stingray mating
Vision
 

 

 

Electroreception in carcharhinid and sphyrnid sharks

Hammerhead shark maneuvering to bite at an electric dipole.

Hammerhead shark biting at a dipole electric field; the voltage equipotentials are shown in red.

Enhanced electroreceptive capabilities may have driven selection for the unique head morphology of hammerhead sharks. The laterally expanded cephalofoil allows hammerheads to possess longer ampullae of Lorenzini tubules which might provide greater sensitivity to weak electric fields. In addition, by spacing the electrosensory pores over a broader area, the hammerhead sharks would sample a larger swath of the substratum and thus increase the probability of prey encounter.

These hypotheses were tested by comparing the behavioral response of juvenile scalloped hammerhead sharks to similar sized sandbar sharks that possess a typical requiem shark head morphology. Both species were exposed to prey-simulating dipole electric fields and their responses were recorded and quantified using digital video analysis. The sharks oriented to, and bit at the electric field as if it were a natural prey item. The hammerheads did not demonstrate greater sensitivity to the dipole electric fields but would likely demonstrate greater sensitivity if exposed to a large, uniform electric field where the greater ampullary tubule length would provide an advantage. Although they were not more sensitive, the hammerheads did sample a much greater area than the sandbar sharks with equivalent spatial resolution.

Thus, the enhanced electrosensory hypothesis is supported as a selective advantage for the evolution of the sphyrnid cephalofoil.

Click to download high resolution copy of hammerhead electrosensory pore distribution

Click to download high resolution copy of sandbar electrosensory pore distribution

Download Quicktime video clip of sharks biting at electric fields (6Meg) Download Quicktime
Kajiura, SM. 2003. Electroreception in neonatal bonnethead sharks, Sphyrna tiburo. Marine Biology 143: 603-611.

Kajiura, SM & KN Holland. 2002. Electroreception in juvenile scalloped hammerhead and sandbar sharks. Journal of Experimental Biology 205(23): 3609-3621.

Kajiura, SM. 2001. Head morphology and electrosensory pore distribution of carcharhinid and sphyrnid sharks. Environmental Biology of Fishes 61(2): 125-133.

 

return to top

modified Dec 30 2003